judicial review
-
The Nero Post: Two Niche Issues in Judicial Review Post-Vavilov
Lest I be accused of fiddling while Rome burns, I wish to note that I approach a pandemic as a time in which we must, subject to social distancing and isolation, proceed as normal as much as possible. Indeed, it is this sense of normalcy that should characterize what we do as much as possible. Continue reading
-
UAlberta Pro-Life: Another Nail in the Doré Coffin?
On the Ontario Bar Association website, Teagan Markin describes and analyzes the recent UAlberta Pro-Life Case, 2020 ABCA 1. I had meant to blog on this decision when it came out, but life intervened, so I thank Markin for reminding me of the case. In the case, Watson JA employs a creative use of the Continue reading
-
What Does Vavilov Stand For?
This post is co-written with Leonid Sirota. As we previously noted in a joint post on Canada (Minister of Citizenship and Immigration) v Vavilov, 2019 SCC 65, that decision leaves open the question whether reasonableness review, as explained in the majority reasons, tends toward deference or vigilance, and so whether it will be more rigorous Continue reading
-
Richardson: Rigorous Vavilov Review
In one of the Federal Court of Appeal’s post-Vavilov cases, CNR v Richardson, the Court (per Nadon JA) demonstrates that Vavilov review, on substantive questions of law, will not be inattentive or subordinate to administrative discretion. Indeed, while some suggest that Vavilovian review is “inherently deferential,” I see the matter quite differently: Richardson shows how Continue reading
-
Tout nouveau, tout beau?
Ce que dit, et ce que ne dit pas, l’arrêt Vavilov, pour nos lecteurs francophones Continue reading
-
CBC v Ferrier, 2019 ONCA 1025: Considering Consideration of the Charter
Part II of a two-part series on Doré. Continue reading
-
After Vavilov, Doré is Under Stress
Part I of a two-part series on Doré Continue reading
-
Day Four: Jonathan Maryniuk
I am honoured to be asked to provide three of my favourite Supreme Court of Canada dissents. I enjoyed reading dissents in my free time even before I was even accepted into law school. Picture me: I am in the lunchroom at one of my summer warehouse jobs in the middle of the night. Continue reading
-
Vavilov’s Reasonableness Standard: A Legal Hard-Look Review
In my first post on Vavilov, I celebrated the Court for finally bringing some sense to the Canadian law of judicial review. Particularly, I focused on three issues relevant to determining the standard of review: the banishment of jurisdictional questions, the introduction of statutory rights of appeal as a category of correctness review, and the Continue reading
Double Aspect 