• Categories
    • Constitutional law
      • Federalism
      • Law of Democracy
      • Law and Religion
    • Constitutional Theory
    • Legal philosophy
    • Political philosophy
      • Power Corrupts
    • The Justice System
    • Criminal Law/Policy
    • Administrative Law
    • New Technologies
    • History
    • Law and economics
    • Literature
    • Uncategorized
  • About
    • About the Blog
    • About Leonid Sirota
    • About Mark Mancini
  • Home
Double Aspect

Double Aspect

Canadian public law and other exciting things


  • February 18, 2019

    Sentencing Judgment Found Inside a Chinese Fortune Cookie

    The sentencing judgment in the Québec City mosque shooter’s case is badly flawed

    Continue reading

    Constitutional law, Criminal Law/Policy
    cruel and unusual punishment, fundamental justice, human dignity, judicial review, overbreadth, remedies, sentencing
  • February 14, 2019

    The Statement of Principles

    Thus far, I have stayed out of the controversy surrounding the Statement of Principles [SOP] because I have nothing new to add. Leonid has, in a series of posts, outlined the in-principle objections to the SOP, while others have suggested that the SOP is a modest, necessary remedy for a difficult problem. But as the

    Continue reading

    Administrative Law, Constitutional law
    Law Society, Ontario, statement of principles
  • February 8, 2019

    A Small Win on Admin Law Expertise

    I’ve written before how the Supreme Court’s approach to expertise is wrongheaded in a number of ways. Practically, by saying that expertise “inheres in a tribunal as an institution,” (Edmonton East, at para 33), the Court has simply asserted a fact that is unlikely to be empirically true across the mass of varied decision-makers. Rather,

    Continue reading

    Administrative Law
    expertise, judicial review
  • February 6, 2019

    Textual Judicial Supremacy

    The Canadian constitution’s text makes it clear that judges must have the last word on its interpretation

    Continue reading

    Constitutional law
    Canada, Charter, constitutional interpretation, judicial review, judicial supremacy, Patriation
  • February 5, 2019

    The Diceyan Trope

    Metaphors, labels, and particular phrases seem to be a constant theme running through Canadian law. In virtually every area of public law, the Supreme Court deploys clever labels and metaphors to convey ideas that are bundled with certain inferences or assumptions about the ideas themselves. The most famous, perhaps, is the living tree model of

    Continue reading

    Administrative Law, Legal philosophy
    Administrative Law, Dicey
  • January 30, 2019

    Australia 1:0 Canada

    Canadians have much to learn from the Australian High Court’s take on election spending limits for “third parties”

    Continue reading

    Constitutional law, Law of Democracy
    Australia, campaign spending, deference, election law, freedom of expression, third parties
  • January 29, 2019

    Affidavi

    Why I oppose the Law Society of Ontario’s “statement of principles”

    Continue reading

    Administrative Law, Constitutional law
    academic freedom, freedom of conscience, Law Society, lawyers, statement of principles
  • January 24, 2019

    At the Executive’s Pleasure

    When Parliament delegates power to agencies, it does so for any number of reasons. At least in theory, Parliament could delegate to a tribunal because it genuinely believes that some particular problem requires expert treatment. Parliament could also delegate as part of a “make or buy” decision, in a Coasian sense: the costs of crafting

    Continue reading

    Administrative Law, Uncategorized
    Administrative Law, legislation, tribunals
  • January 23, 2019

    Look, Look, over There!

    What role should comparative law play in constitutional adjudication in Canada?

    Continue reading

    Constitutional law
    Canada, Charter, comparative law, constitutional interpretation
  • January 21, 2019

    Civics, Feelings, and Politics

    Expatriates’ alleged lack of connection to particular ridings is not a good reason to disenfranchise them

    Continue reading

    Constitutional law, Law of Democracy
    Canada, expatriates, politics, voting
«Previous Page Next Page»

Recent Posts

  • Truth about Allegiance
  • New Stuff
  • Voldemortion
  • La leçon du Père Bourgeois
  • Mémoire
  • Notwithstanding Myths
  • “I’m from the New Right and I’m Here to Help”
  • Whiplash
  • How to Make a “Constitution”
  • Ceci n’est pas une constitution

Get the posts by email


Recent Posts

  • Truth about Allegiance
  • New Stuff
  • Voldemortion

Follow Me

Tumblr

WordPress

Instagram

Newsletter

Website Powered by WordPress.com.

  • Subscribe Subscribed
    • Double Aspect
    • Join 350 other subscribers
    • Already have a WordPress.com account? Log in now.
    • Double Aspect
    • Subscribe Subscribed
    • Sign up
    • Log in
    • Report this content
    • View site in Reader
    • Manage subscriptions
    • Collapse this bar