-
The Administrative Law “Trilogy”: The Stare Decisis Trap
This post originally appeared on Advocates for the Rule of Law. This week, the Supreme Court of Canada finally heard the consolidated appeals in Bell/NFL and Vavilov. ARL, expertly represented by Adam Goldenberg, put forward our submissions on the matter, which focus on a return to the basis of the law of judicial review: its…
-
Lost Virtue
Joseph Raz revisits the subject of the virtue of the Rule of Law
-
Lowering Expectations: The Supreme Court’s Standard of Review Cases
Why, sadly, Canada’s administrative law community should probably lower its expectations.
-
The Supreme Court’s Unreasonable Reasons Doctrine in Admin Law
Why Newfoundland Nurses should be overturned and a recent FCA case adopted as a new starting point.
-
Vancouver Event Next Week
Announcing another talk
-
When Judicial Disagreement Doesn’t Matter
What does it mean for an appellate court’s decision to be unanimous?
-
Criticizing the Supreme Court
Why we should vigorously dissent when the occasion presents itself.
-
Reading from a Palimpsest
The Supreme Court of New Zealand holds that declarations of inconsistency are available when Parliament disregards the New Zealand Bill of Rights Act
-
Upcoming Canadian Talks
Events at Calgary, McGill, and Queen’s
-
Delusions of Grandeur
Justice Abella sets out a vision of the Supreme Court as arbiter of national values
