-
New Swearwords
The Prime Minister wants to make a meaningless addition to our unconstitutional citizenship oath
-
Maneant Scripta
The Supreme Court protects its sources from “link rot”
-
Too Conventional
The UK Supreme Court’s conventional, and indefensible, thinking on the issue of constitutional conventions
-
Losing Our Way
Neither “society’s tolerance” nor the “captive audience” doctrine justify censorship of anti-abortion ads
-
Do You Really Have to Go?
Lessons for Canada and New Zealand on resignations of MPs
-
Why Bother about the Charter?
The Supreme Court divides on whether one might claim Charter damages against an administrative tribunal
-
Aborting Freedom of Expression
If a city can censor anti-abortion ads to prevent hurt feelings, is there anything that could not be censored?
-
Was Scalia Spooky?
Antonin Scalia’s views on snooping, in the 1970s and later
-
Don’t Know What You’re up to
Thoughts on Ilya Somin’s take on the consequences of political ignorance for judicial review
-
Says Who, Again?
Peter McCormick on why “by the Court” decisions matter – and who wrote them.
Double Aspect 