• Categories
    • Constitutional law
      • Federalism
      • Law of Democracy
      • Law and Religion
    • Constitutional Theory
    • Legal philosophy
    • Political philosophy
      • Power Corrupts
    • The Justice System
    • Criminal Law/Policy
    • Administrative Law
    • New Technologies
    • History
    • Law and economics
    • Literature
    • Uncategorized
  • About
    • About the Blog
    • About Leonid Sirota
    • About Mark Mancini
  • Home
Double Aspect

Double Aspect

Canadian public law and other exciting things


  • November 8, 2020

    You Read It Here First

    The Supreme Court holds that the Charter does not protect corporations against cruel and unusual punishment

    Continue reading

    Constitutional law
    Charter, comparative law, constitutional interpretation, cruel and unusual punishment, international law, textualism
  • November 3, 2020

    Activism v Constitution

    The federal court rightly holds that the judiciary cannot control Canada’s climate policy

    Continue reading

    Constitutional law
    Charter, climate change, courts, environment, judicial power, justiciability
  • November 2, 2020

    Linguistic Nihilism

    One common line of attack against textualism—the idea that “the words of a governing text are of paramount concern, and what they convey, in their context, is what the text means (Scalia & Garner, at 56)—is that language is never clear, or put differently, hopelessly vague or ambiguous. Put this way, the task of interpretation

    Continue reading

    Administrative Law, statutory interpretation
    purpose, statutory interpretation, textualism
  • October 28, 2020

    Let Us Reason Together

    A call for dialogue on constitutional interpretation, free from anti-originalist myths

    Continue reading

    Uncategorized
    constitutional amendment, constitutional interpretation, living constitutionalism, original intent, originalism
  • October 19, 2020

    A Proclivity for Plunder

    The left and the right are united in wanting to regulate the internet by taking from their enemies and giving to their friends

    Continue reading

    New Technologies, Political philosophy
    Bastiat, internet, libertarianism, property rights, regulation
  • October 15, 2020

    Missing the Forest for the Living Tree

    What Lord Sankey actually meant with his living tree metaphor

    Continue reading

    Constitutional law
    constitutional interpretation, living constitutionalism, living tree, originalism
  • October 14, 2020

    “Purposive” Does Not Equal “Generous”: The Interpretation Act

    It is often said in Canada that statutes must be interpreted “purposively” and “generously.” Many cite the federal Interpretation Act’s s.12, which apparently mandates this marriage between purposive and generous interpretation: 12 Every enactment is deemed remedial, and shall be given such fair, large and liberal construction and interpretation as best ensures the attainment of its

    Continue reading

    statutory interpretation, The Justice System
    interpretation, purposive
  • October 13, 2020

    Just Asking

    Should the power over criminal law be transferred to the provinces?

    Continue reading

    Constitutional law, Criminal Law/Policy, Federalism
    Charter, division of powers, notwithstanding clause, subsidiarity
  • October 8, 2020

    What Needs to Be Said

    Sometimes people say things that need to be said. These things may make us uncomfortable. They may force us to look in the mirror. They may ask us to really sit and think about our conduct. We might not like to hear these things, but they might start a discussion. Or maybe they will force

    Continue reading

    Administrative Law, Constitutional law, statutory interpretation, The Justice System
    judging, Justice Stratas, Kattenburg
  • September 24, 2020

    The Sex Appeal of Power

    I’ve noticed a disturbing trend recently, in both politics and law. The idea is what I call the “one-way ratchet fallacy” of power. It goes like this: when an institution or entity obtains power of some kind, that power will only ever be used to fulfill certain goals rather than others. That is, people might

    Continue reading

    Constitutional law, Constitutional Theory, Legal philosophy, Power Corrupts
    constitutional interpretation, critical race theory, living tree, power
«Previous Page Next Page»

Recent Posts

  • Truth about Allegiance
  • New Stuff
  • Voldemortion
  • La leçon du Père Bourgeois
  • Mémoire
  • Notwithstanding Myths
  • “I’m from the New Right and I’m Here to Help”
  • Whiplash
  • How to Make a “Constitution”
  • Ceci n’est pas une constitution

Get the posts by email


Recent Posts

  • Truth about Allegiance
  • New Stuff
  • Voldemortion

Follow Me

Tumblr

WordPress

Instagram

Newsletter

Website Powered by WordPress.com.

  • Subscribe Subscribed
    • Double Aspect
    • Join 350 other subscribers
    • Already have a WordPress.com account? Log in now.
    • Double Aspect
    • Subscribe Subscribed
    • Sign up
    • Log in
    • Report this content
    • View site in Reader
    • Manage subscriptions
    • Collapse this bar