Skip to content
  • Categories
    • Constitutional law
      • Federalism
      • Law of Democracy
      • Law and Religion
    • Constitutional Theory
    • Legal philosophy
    • Political philosophy
      • Power Corrupts
    • The Justice System
    • Criminal Law/Policy
    • Administrative Law
    • New Technologies
    • History
    • Law and economics
    • Literature
    • Uncategorized
  • About
    • About the Blog
    • About Leonid Sirota
    • About Mark Mancini
  • Home
Double Aspect

Double Aspect

Canadian public law and other exciting things


  • November 25, 2020

    Declarations of Unconstitutionality as Judgments In Rem: A Response to Professor Daly

    This post is written by Marc-Antoine Gervais, and a larger paper on the subject will appear in the McGill Law Journal (vol. 66). Canada’s model of judicial review of legislation is unusual. On the one hand, it is “diffuse” in that all courts of law (and many administrative tribunals) may decide constitutional questions. On the…

    Continue reading

    Constitutional law, Constitutional Theory
    declarations of inconsistency, in rem, remedies
  • November 25, 2020

    Guest Post: Marc-Antoine Gervais

    It is my pleasure to announce a guest post today by Marc-Antoine Gervais, on the subject of declarations of invalidity as in rem judgments. The post is a response to Paul Daly’s recent post on declarations of invalidity in the aftermath of the Sullivan decision. Marc-Antoine has a larger paper coming out in the McGill…

    Continue reading

    Guest Posts
    declarations of inconsistency, guest post, in rem
  • November 23, 2020

    Textualism for Hedgehogs

    Why substantive canons belong in textualist interpretation, and what this tells us about neutral interpretive principles

    Continue reading

    Constitutional law, statutory interpretation
    interpretation, interpretive canons, neutrality, principle of legality, textualism
  • November 12, 2020

    Neutrality in Legal Interpretation

    Nowadays, it is unfashionable to say that legal rules, particularly rules of interpretation, should be “neutral.” Quite the opposite: now it is more fashionable to say that results in cases depend on the “politics” of a court on a particular day. Against this modern trend, not so long ago, it was Herbert Wechsler in his…

    Continue reading

    Administrative Law, Constitutional law, statutory interpretation
    constitutional interpretation, neutrality, statutory interpretation, textualism
  • November 9, 2020

    Still Keeping It Complicated

    The Supreme Court tries to bring more rigour to constitutional interpretation and takes a step towards textualism, but won’t admit it

    Continue reading

    Constitutional law
    Charter, constitutional interpretation, cruel and unusual punishment, living constitutionalism, originalism, Supreme Court of Canada, textualism
  • November 8, 2020

    You Read It Here First

    The Supreme Court holds that the Charter does not protect corporations against cruel and unusual punishment

    Continue reading

    Constitutional law
    Charter, comparative law, constitutional interpretation, cruel and unusual punishment, international law, textualism
  • November 3, 2020

    Activism v Constitution

    The federal court rightly holds that the judiciary cannot control Canada’s climate policy

    Continue reading

    Constitutional law
    Charter, climate change, courts, environment, judicial power, justiciability
  • November 2, 2020

    Linguistic Nihilism

    One common line of attack against textualism—the idea that “the words of a governing text are of paramount concern, and what they convey, in their context, is what the text means (Scalia & Garner, at 56)—is that language is never clear, or put differently, hopelessly vague or ambiguous. Put this way, the task of interpretation…

    Continue reading

    Administrative Law, statutory interpretation
    purpose, statutory interpretation, textualism
  • October 28, 2020

    Let Us Reason Together

    A call for dialogue on constitutional interpretation, free from anti-originalist myths

    Continue reading

    Uncategorized
    constitutional amendment, constitutional interpretation, living constitutionalism, original intent, originalism
  • October 19, 2020

    A Proclivity for Plunder

    The left and the right are united in wanting to regulate the internet by taking from their enemies and giving to their friends

    Continue reading

    New Technologies, Political philosophy
    Bastiat, internet, libertarianism, property rights, regulation
«Previous Page Next Page»

Recent Posts

  • The Cavemen Are Back
  • Moving Rights
  • Forget Me Not
  • What Is Going On?
  • The Kiwis Do It Better
  • Truth about Allegiance
  • New Stuff
  • Voldemortion
  • La leçon du Père Bourgeois
  • Mémoire

Get the posts by email


Recent Posts

  • The Cavemen Are Back
  • Moving Rights
  • Forget Me Not

Follow Me

Tumblr

WordPress

Instagram

Newsletter

Website Powered by WordPress.com.

  • Subscribe Subscribed
    • Double Aspect
    • Join 354 other subscribers
    • Already have a WordPress.com account? Log in now.
    • Double Aspect
    • Subscribe Subscribed
    • Sign up
    • Log in
    • Report this content
    • View site in Reader
    • Manage subscriptions
    • Collapse this bar