• Categories
    • Constitutional law
      • Federalism
      • Law of Democracy
      • Law and Religion
    • Constitutional Theory
    • Legal philosophy
    • Political philosophy
      • Power Corrupts
    • The Justice System
    • Criminal Law/Policy
    • Administrative Law
    • New Technologies
    • History
    • Law and economics
    • Literature
    • Uncategorized
  • About
    • About the Blog
    • About Leonid Sirota
    • About Mark Mancini
  • Home
Double Aspect

Double Aspect

Canadian public law and other exciting things


  • April 16, 2019

    Nothing to Celebrate

    Québec’s irreligious dress code proposal isn’t an opportunity to extol democracy, or to do away with judicial review of legislation

    Continue reading

    Constitutional Theory, Political philosophy
    Charter, democracy, federalism, judicial review, notwithstanding clause, rights
  • April 15, 2019

    Abellian “Law”

    It is with an utter lack of surprise that I yet again fill the virtual pages of Double Aspect with thoughts on another of Justice Abella’s comments on the nature of judging. Both Leonid and I have continuously written about how Justice Abella frequently displays a judicial arrogance  that is inconsistent with the role of

    Continue reading

    Constitutional Theory, The Justice System
    Justice Abella, statutory interpretation, textualism
  • April 11, 2019

    Is This Correct?

    Should deference be denied to administrative interpretations of laws that implement international human rights?

    Continue reading

    Administrative Law
    international law, judicial review, reasonableness, refugees, standard of review, statutory interpretation
  • April 9, 2019

    The “Return” of “Textualism” at the SCC[?]

    Under the so-called “modern approach” to statutory interpretation, courts are instructed to take into account the text, context, and purpose of a statute. But perhaps because the “text, context, and purpose” recital is so commonplace, other difficult interpretive questions are masked under its patina. For example, which takes priority—text or purpose? The Supreme Court has

    Continue reading

    Legal philosophy, The Justice System
    purposivism, statutory interpretation, textualism
  • April 8, 2019

    End of a Scandal

    An attempt to criminalize criticism of New Zeand’s judges is rejected by a parliamentary select committee

    Continue reading

    Constitutional law, The Justice System
    contempt of court, courts, freedom of expression, judges, New Zealand, presumption of innocence
  • April 7, 2019

    Ce qui compte

    Que le projet de loi anti-religieux du Québec soit ou non raciste ou islamophobe est sans importance. Ce qui compte, c’est son illibéralisme

    Continue reading

    Law and Religion, Political philosophy
    Charte de la honte, laïcité, liberté, Québec
  • April 6, 2019

    What Really Matters

    Whether Québec’s anti-religious bill is racist or Islamophobic is beside the point. What matters is its illiberalism

    Continue reading

    Law and Religion, Political philosophy
    Charte de la honte, equality, freedom, laïcité, Québec
  • April 5, 2019

    Judicial Supremacy, Again

    Another attack on judicial supremacy misses the mark

    Continue reading

    Constitutional Theory
    Canada, judicial review, judicial supremacy
  • April 4, 2019

    Can an agency choose not to enforce Bill 21?

    Last week, the English Montreal School Board [EMSB] announced that it is refusing to to implement Bill 21, introduced by the Quebec government. The law would ban workers in the public sphere in positions of authority from wearing “religious symbols” while at work. The government, apparently cognizant of the challenges this could raise under the

    Continue reading

    Administrative Law, Constitutional law
    bill 21, Charter, niqab, notwithstanding clause
  • March 30, 2019

    Is Québec’s Dress Code Unconstitutional?

    There is a serious argument to be made that Québec’s ban on religious symbols infringes the federal division of powers

    Continue reading

    Constitutional law, Federalism, Law and Religion
    Charte de la honte, Charter, notwithstanding clause, provincial constitution, Québec, secularism
«Previous Page Next Page»

Recent Posts

  • Truth about Allegiance
  • New Stuff
  • Voldemortion
  • La leçon du Père Bourgeois
  • Mémoire
  • Notwithstanding Myths
  • “I’m from the New Right and I’m Here to Help”
  • Whiplash
  • How to Make a “Constitution”
  • Ceci n’est pas une constitution

Get the posts by email


Recent Posts

  • Truth about Allegiance
  • New Stuff
  • Voldemortion

Follow Me

Tumblr

WordPress

Instagram

Newsletter

Website Powered by WordPress.com.

  • Subscribe Subscribed
    • Double Aspect
    • Join 350 other subscribers
    • Already have a WordPress.com account? Log in now.
    • Double Aspect
    • Subscribe Subscribed
    • Sign up
    • Log in
    • Report this content
    • View site in Reader
    • Manage subscriptions
    • Collapse this bar