Skip to content
  • Categories
    • Constitutional law
      • Federalism
      • Law of Democracy
      • Law and Religion
    • Constitutional Theory
    • Legal philosophy
    • Political philosophy
      • Power Corrupts
    • The Justice System
    • Criminal Law/Policy
    • Administrative Law
    • New Technologies
    • History
    • Law and economics
    • Literature
    • Uncategorized
  • About
    • About the Blog
    • About Leonid Sirota
    • About Mark Mancini
  • Home
Double Aspect

Double Aspect

Canadian public law and other exciting things


  • July 18, 2012

    No Resraint

    The Superior Court of Québec issued a potentially far-reaching decision last week, declaring a number of provisions of the Expenditure Restraint Act, S.C. 2009, c. 2, s. 393, constitutionally inapplicable to the CBC/Société Radio-Canada. In Association des Réalisateurs c. Canada (Procureur Général), 2012 QCCS 3223, justice Lise Matteau held that the application of provisions limiting…

    Continue reading

    Constitutional law, Political philosophy
    collective bargaining, freedom of association, government, unions
  • July 17, 2012

    The Prerogative of High-Handedness

    Today, the Federal Court of Canada has issued its decision in Turp v. Canada (Justice), 2012 FC 893, rejecting Daniel Turp’s challenge to the federal government’s decision to withdraw Canada from the Kyoto Protocol. Unambiguously correct in law, this decision illustrates the importance of politics, and the limits of the power of the courts to hold governments…

    Continue reading

    Constitutional law, Political philosophy, The Justice System
    federal court of canada, Kyoto, politics, underlying principles
  • July 16, 2012

    The Moneyed Interests

    Restrictions on pre-electoral spending by citizens and groups other than political parties and their candidates (known in the jargon as “third-party spending”) have gained a rather unlikely supporter: Tom Flanagan. Prof. Flanagan, arguably Canada’s most prominent conservative thinker, has come out in support of such restrictions in an op-ed in the Globe and Mail. This…

    Continue reading

    Constitutional law, Law of Democracy, Political philosophy
    campaign spending, election law, elections, john rawls, politics, unions
  • July 16, 2012

    Ne parlez pas en bien, ne parlez pas en mal

    Radio-Canada a mis en ligne une entrevue avec Denis Dion, un porte-parole du Directeur général des élections du Québec, portant, pour l’essentiel, sur l’application éventuelle de la Loi électorale, et notamment de ses règles concernant les « tiers »,  aux médias sociaux, vu l’importance du rôle qu’ils pourraient jouer dans la prochaine campagne électorale. C’est…

    Continue reading

    Constitutional law, Law of Democracy, New Technologies
    election law, elections, médias sociaux, politics, politique, Québec, social media
  • July 13, 2012

    Minus the Mandatory Minimum

    Last week, another mandatory minimum sentence introduced as part of the federal government’s “tough-on-crime” agenda was declared unconstitutional, this time by the Ontario Court of Justice. The provision at issue in R. v. Lewis, 2012 ONCJ 413, is par. 99(2)(a) of the Criminal Code, and imposes a mandatory minimum of three-years’ imprisonment for a first-time firearms…

    Continue reading

    Constitutional law, Criminal Law/Policy
    criminal law, mandatory minimum, punishment, tough on crime
  • July 12, 2012

    Plus on est de monde…

    Il y aura, dit-on, bientôt des élections au Québec. Et qui dit élections, dit débat des chefs. Et qui dit débat des chefs, dit controverse sur la question de qui inviter et qui laisser de côté. Gilbert Lavoie pose la question en vue de la prochaine campagne électorale dans un billet sur son blogue pour…

    Continue reading

    Constitutional law, Law of Democracy
    débat des chefs, election law, elections, leaders debates, Québec
  • July 11, 2012

    Operation Dismantle at the Olympics

    Citizens concerned that the deployment of a weapons system in their place of residence will expose them to an increased risk of a devastating attack turn to the courts to try to block the deployment. They fail. To a Canadian constitutional law junkie, that’s the short story of Operation Dismantle v. The Queen, [1985] 1 S.C.R.…

    Continue reading

    Administrative Law, Constitutional law
    justiciability, national security, Olympics
  • July 10, 2012

    Googling Justice

    Law review articles don’t make newspapers very often. But they do sometimes, as I noted in a post discussing the use of a certain four-letter word by Supreme Courts in the U.S. and Canada. Another example is a very interesting forthcoming paper by Allison Orr Larsen, of the William & Mary School of Law, called…

    Continue reading

    Legal philosophy, New Technologies, The Justice System
    evidence, judges, judging, legislative facts
  • July 8, 2012

    Arguing with Death, Again

    I wrote, three months ago now, about the sorts of arguments people make for and against the death penalty. Contrary perhaps to our intuitions, from at least the times of Thucydides, death penalty’s opponents have tended to resort to consequentialist arguments, while its supporters have relied on appeals to justice. A couple of interviews the…

    Continue reading

    Constitutional Theory, Political philosophy
    argument, consequentialism, death penalty, justice
  • July 7, 2012

    Constitutional Implications

    I have come across a fairly interesting new article, “A Comparative Analysis of the Doctrinal Consequences of Interpretive Disagreements for Implied Constitutional Rights,” by Zoë Robinson, of DePaul University’s College of Law. On the basis of a comparison between Australia and the United States, specifically between the development of a right to free political communication…

    Continue reading

    Constitutional law, Constitutional Theory
    constitution, implied bill of rights, underlying principles
«Previous Page Next Page»

Recent Posts

  • How Power Corrupts VI
  • Jurisdictional Jiu-Jitsu
  • Booking
  • Not My Circus
  • You Can’t Have a Pony
  • Indefensible
  • The Rest Is Noise
  • Spinning the Wheel
  • Nothing Matters Still
  • The Cavemen Are Back

Get the posts by email


Recent Posts

  • How Power Corrupts VI
  • Jurisdictional Jiu-Jitsu
  • Booking

Follow Me

Tumblr

WordPress

Instagram

Newsletter

Website Powered by WordPress.com.

  • Subscribe Subscribed
    • Double Aspect
    • Join 356 other subscribers
    • Already have a WordPress.com account? Log in now.
    • Double Aspect
    • Subscribe Subscribed
    • Sign up
    • Log in
    • Report this content
    • View site in Reader
    • Manage subscriptions
    • Collapse this bar