Skip to content
  • Categories
    • Constitutional law
      • Federalism
      • Law of Democracy
      • Law and Religion
    • Constitutional Theory
    • Legal philosophy
    • Political philosophy
      • Power Corrupts
    • The Justice System
    • Criminal Law/Policy
    • Administrative Law
    • New Technologies
    • History
    • Law and economics
    • Literature
    • Uncategorized
  • About
    • About the Blog
    • About Leonid Sirota
    • About Mark Mancini
  • Home
Double Aspect

Double Aspect

Canadian public law and other exciting things


  • July 19, 2013

    Nothing Like It

    Law, perhaps even more than man, is a creature of habit. It thrives on the humdrum. It likes nothing better than demonstrations that one case is just like some other in all relevant respects. It is a creature of habit in a more literal sense too, in that legal rules often crystallize out of the…

    Continue reading

    Constitutional Theory, Legal philosophy
    common law, judging, judicial review, precedent
  • July 18, 2013

    Égalité, Liberté?

    As I was thinking about the application of the liberty interest protected by s. 7 of the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms to the family/marriage context, which I have written about here and here, a question occurred to me: why wasn’t it invoked to argue for the unconstitutionality of denying same-sex couple the opportunity to…

    Continue reading

    Constitutional law, Constitutional Theory
    equality, liberty, marriage, same-sex marriage
  • July 17, 2013

    Vies Communes

    Il y a quelques jours, je parlais des promesses que l’État peut ou ne peut pas exiger de gens à l’occasion de leur mariage. Cependant, dans les faits, les provinces de common law n’exigent pas que les gens qui se marient civilement promettent quoi que ce soit au sujet de leur vie future. Le Québec,…

    Continue reading

    Constitutional law, Constitutional Theory
    Charter, famille, liberty, mariage, marriage, Québec
  • July 16, 2013

    The Crown and the Oath

    A friend comments on my earlier post, in which I argued that the oath of allegiance to the Queen which would-be Canadian citizens are required to swear is unconstitutional: The wording of the oath of allegiance found in the Citizenship Act flows directly from the preamble and various sections of the Constitution Act, 1867 which…

    Continue reading

    Constitutional law, Constitutional Theory
    Charter, citizenship, constitution, monarchy, oath
  • July 14, 2013

    Ask Not

    I have written more than enough about the oath of allegiance to Queen that would-be Canadian citizens have to take, but I have thought of an analogy that I like and which just might help us think the matter through. The Canadian citizenship is like marriage ― not necessarily in some romantic or esoteric way, though there…

    Continue reading

    Constitutional law, Constitutional Theory
    citizenship, conscience, marriage, oath, vow
  • July 13, 2013

    Empty Promise

    I wrote yesterday about the challenge now being considered by the Superior Court of Ontario to the constitutionality of the wording of the oath of allegiance that would-be Canadian citizens must swear or affirm. The oath requires one to promise loyalty and fidelity to the Queen, her heirs, and successors. As I explained, the Federal…

    Continue reading

    Constitutional law
    Charter, citizenship, conscience, freedom of expression, monarchy, oath
  • July 12, 2013

    True Allegiance

    When I became a Canadian citizen, more than 10 years ago now, I had, a according to the Citizenship Act, to affirm that I [would] be faithful and bear true allegiance to Her Majesty Queen Elizabeth the Second, Queen of Canada, Her Heirs and Successors, and that I will faithfully observe the laws of Canada…

    Continue reading

    Constitutional law
    citizenship, conscience, monarchy, oath
  • July 10, 2013

    Scripta Volant Quoque

    The Romans said ― or, more likely, wrote ― that while words fly away, writing remains. Russians say that what is written with the quill cannot be hacked away with an axe.  The idea of the permanence of the written word is very widespread. It is part of the law, too, whether in the rules…

    Continue reading

    New Technologies, The Justice System
    citations, hyperlinks, internet, judges, link rot
  • July 4, 2013

    Says Who?

    Exposing the secrets of the powerful is all the rage. And there are different ways of doing that, not all of them involving spending weeks in the transit zone of the Sheremetyevo Airport. As a fascinating recent paper shows, one of these more comfortable ways involves analyzing the language of judicial opinions in order to…

    Continue reading

    Constitutional Theory, The Justice System
    courts, judges, judicial opinions, transparency
  • July 3, 2013

    Then and Now

    Much has been said and written in the last few years, both in Canada and in the United States, about the role of money in politics and also about the importance of electoral procedures in enfranchising ― or disenfranchising ― citizens. But this is not a new problem, as a description of the English electoral…

    Continue reading

    History, Law of Democracy
    elections, UK
«Previous Page Next Page»

Recent Posts

  • Baguette magique ou nez de clown
  • How Power Corrupts VI
  • Jurisdictional Jiu-Jitsu
  • Booking
  • Not My Circus
  • You Can’t Have a Pony
  • Indefensible
  • The Rest Is Noise
  • Spinning the Wheel
  • Nothing Matters Still

Get the posts by email


Recent Posts

  • Baguette magique ou nez de clown
  • How Power Corrupts VI
  • Jurisdictional Jiu-Jitsu

Follow Me

Tumblr

WordPress

Instagram

Newsletter

Website Powered by WordPress.com.

  • Subscribe Subscribed
    Double Aspect
    Join 354 other subscribers

    Have a WordPress.com account? Log in now.

  • Double Aspect
    View site in Reader
    Manage subscriptionsSign upLog in
    Report this content
    Collapse this bar