-
Ce qui compte
Que le projet de loi anti-religieux du Québec soit ou non raciste ou islamophobe est sans importance. Ce qui compte, c’est son illibéralisme
-
What Really Matters
Whether Québec’s anti-religious bill is racist or Islamophobic is beside the point. What matters is its illiberalism
-
Judicial Supremacy, Again
Another attack on judicial supremacy misses the mark
-
Can an agency choose not to enforce Bill 21?
Last week, the English Montreal School Board [EMSB] announced that it is refusing to to implement Bill 21, introduced by the Quebec government. The law would ban workers in the public sphere in positions of authority from wearing “religious symbols” while at work. The government, apparently cognizant of the challenges this could raise under the…
-
Is Québec’s Dress Code Unconstitutional?
There is a serious argument to be made that Québec’s ban on religious symbols infringes the federal division of powers
-
Lessening Us: The Supreme Court and SNC-Lavalin
The SNC-Lavalin episode gets worse, if that is possible.
-
The Empty Canard of the Living Tree “Doctrine”
In 1989, Justice Scalia gave a speech entitled “Assorted Canards of Contemporary Legal Analysis.” These “canards,” are “certain oft-repeated statements…” that, while having “little actual impact upon the decision of the case” are “part of its atmospherics, or of its overarching philosophy…” Justice Scalia gave the example of the old adage that “remedial statutes should…
-
Bad Taste
Overzealous prosecutors in Québec charge the author and publisher of a novel with child pornography for describing a rape
-
Does the Constitution Mean Anything?
In defence of textualism in constitutional interpretation
-
A Perspective from the North
A review of Jeffrey Pojanowski’s “neoclassical” approach to administrative law
